This is the biggest ‘anti-environment’ policy that was imposed in the first 100 days of Trump, according to experts

President Donald Trump has implemented a number of policies that could endanger the environment and hamper the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas for the first 100 days in office, according to environmental policy experts.

When Trump was inaugurated for his second term on January 20, his government was ready – destroyed the record for the most executive order signed on the first day of the office.

Some of the 54 executive commands signed on the day of inauguration that have an impact on the environment, including a National Energy Emergency Declaration, Withdrawing the US from the Paris Agreement For the second time and turning back drilling restrictions on the soil and federal waters.

The policy is mostly shrouded in the idea of ​​US independence or “placing an American first“Orders state.

The Trump government has been involved in the “Flood Zone” strategy to flood the environmental community and make it almost impossible for them to respond to every executive order, and Esty, a law professor and environmental policy at Yale University and former Commissioner of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Connecticut, told ABC News.

While some of Trump’s “anti-environment” policies, as Esty, said that it gathered more attention than others, he added that the public should not ignore the setbacks or actions that seemed small.

“There are a number of smoother actions that have been taken by the Trump administration which also has a significant corrosive effect on our efforts to promote actions on climate change and a more sustainable future,” he said.

One example quoted is rollback from Carbon social costs Regulations, a policy implemented during the Obama government, said Esty. This decision can overturize the energy and environmental regulations designed to overcome the greenhouse gas emissions that greatly contribute to climate change, he explained.

“The elimination of carbon social costs has a subtle but absorbed effect that will really damage environmental protection,” Esty said.

Another example is Trump’s executive command to protect “American energy from the country’s outreach,” which contains the language that can be Block law enforcement State and local laws that intervene in the production or use of coal, oil, natural gas, hydropower, geothermal, biofuel and nuclear energy. This order focuses energy regulations at the federal level and targets policies that limit carbon emissions, which can further frustrate decarbonization efforts and restore air and clean water protection, experts said.

On Monday, Trump Administration dismiss the writer From the Sixth National Climate Assessment Report – The US Government’s Leading Report on Risks, Impacts, and Responses to Climate Change Mandated by the Congress and produced every four years. In the email to the author, administration writes that “The scope of NCA6 is currently being re -evaluated” and officials “Release all the current assessment participants from their role.”

The “”Climate backtracker“The database, which was started by the Calumbia University of Sabin Climate Change Center which tracks the steps taken by Trump’s administration to reduce or eliminate climate mitigation steps and federal adaptation, stated more than 100 actions taken since January 20.

It would be difficult to reverse the damage carried out by many of these policies, John Holdren, a professor of environmental science and policies and former science advisers for President Barack Obama, told ABC News.

“You cannot replace the damaged program very quickly,” he said.

These are some Trump policies that according to some experts can cause the most environmental damage.

Trying to increase fossil fuel production

The Trump Declaration on the National Energy Emergency Lops a framework to implement a policy that increases domestic production of fossil fuels, experts said.

“We need a reliable, diverse, and affordable energy supply to encourage the manufacturing, transportation, agriculture and defense industries, and to maintain the basis of modern life and military readiness,” according to the executive order He signed.

In addition to limiting drilling restrictions, Trump also signed the executive command Expand mining and use of coal In the US

On April 18, Ministry of Home Affairs announced a new offshore leasing plan on the continental shelf outside the US.

Sam Sankar, Senior Vice President at Earthjustice, the largest public environmental environmental law firm in the country, told ABC News that US fossil fuel production was at the highest point of all time, even though the Trump Crisis of the Energy Crisis.

In 2024, the country produced 13.2 million barrels of oil per day, breaking the record set in 2019 at 12.3 million barrels, according to data from AS ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION. Over the past few years, the US has become the largest producer Oil and natural gas in the world.

EPA deregulation

Some of the environmental freedom experienced by Americans today – clean air, clean water and clean rain between them – can be immediately in the danger of the planned deregulation of the Environmental Protection Agency, according to experts.

On March 12, EPA was announced It takes part in the “biggest deregulation action in US history.” This step includes revolving emission regulations regarding coal, oil and gas production and re -evaluating the findings of the government that determines that greenhouse gas emissions heat the planet and are a threat to public health, said EPA administrator Lee Zeldin.

“Together with President Trump, we fulfill our promise to release American energy, lower costs for Americans, revitalize the American automotive industry, and work directly with our country’s partners to advance the mission with us,” Zeldin said in March.

In November, when Trump announced his intention to nominate Zeldin, he said the new EPA administrator would “ensure a fair and fast deregulation decision that would be imposed by releasing the power of American business” in a post on his social media platform Truth social.

Withdrawing this regulation will hamper the ability of EPA to keep Americans from being sick due to exposure to environmental pollutants, experts said.

“Every policy change that may occur under this government will continue to protect human health and the environment,” said the EPA spokesman in response to the request of ABC’s comments. “They will be guided by science and law, as well as input from the public. They will also be guided by many executive orders issued by the President and Administrator EPA Zeldin Powering the Great American Comeback Initiative. “

However, the health of Americans can suffer as a result of sweeping regulations in EPA, said Sankar.

“All rules [Trump] Rolling back is intended to facilitate fossil fuel producers to produce petrochemicals and fuel supplies, “he said.” All of these things have extraordinary health consequences. “

Federal shooting and budget cuts, programs

After serving, Trump created the Government Efficiency Department (DOGE), supervised by billionaire Elon Musk and intended to include cost cutting in the federal government.

Since then, Doge has eliminated thousands of federal employees in major scientific institutions, such as marine administration and national atmosphere and NASA.

White House The word Trump created Doge “To bring accountability and transparency to federal expenditure, ensuring the taxpayer dollar is spent wisely and effectively.”

NWS has canceled the launch of certain weather balloons and is dealing with staffing problems in many of its local offices as a result of cutting, the agency announced in March.

Administration has “cut staff, cutting the budget, cutting programs in various federal departments and institutions with the responsibility to support this huge science and technology company,” Holdren said.

While “attacks” on environmental policies, as Esty said it, was anticipated to enter the second term of Trump, the cutting of personnel who sweep it did not.

“When people who have expertise and competence to leave the government, you cannot find them and knit them again and rearrange them into a team very quickly,” Holdren said.

Esty added, “It has long been understood that a good policy depends on careful analysis and good science, and we see the capacity to provide the foundation systematically damaged.”

Meanwhile, mentioning climate change began to disappear from a public website after the inauguration day.

“This is hardly seen as something that is lacking from wholesale attacks on sources of scientific innovations and technology in this country,” Holdren said.