The Court of Appeal with Venezuelan who was looking back to us from El Salvador

A 20 -year -old Venezuelan man who searched back to the United States after being sent to El Salvador won a legal victory over President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday.

The panel that was divided from the 4-1 circuit appeal court chose 2-1 to leave orders that direct Trump’s administration to facilitate the return of the man after a federal judge in Maryland decided that his deportation violated the existing legal settlement.

The man, who was identified in a court record under the pseudonym “Cristian,” challenged his transfer after he was sent in mid-March on a flight to El Salvador after President Trump’s prayer on the alien enemy law.

US District Judge Stephanie Gallagher, a person who was appointed by Trump, found in April that the transfer of Cristian violated the completion of the upper class action of individuals who entered the US as a minor without a companion and then looked for asylum.

The government then asked the appeal court to reverse Gallagher’s orders, with the reason that direction to return Cristian to the US “will impose a serious foreign policy damage to the government and threaten the public interest, while not doing anything for Cristian,” according to the submission of a government court.

Judge Circuit Deandrea Gist Benjamin and Roger Gregory, wrote for the majority of panels, rejecting administrative reasons.

“The argument that the government will ‘cannot be improved’ by facilitating Cristian’s re -ring,” Benjamin wrote. “Cristian’s injury emerged from the fact that instead of having a asylum application that was decided based on services – as guaranteed by the settlement agreement – he was deleted,” added Benjamin, a person appointed by Biden to the Regional Court.

The government argued in a motion to remain that eliminating Cristian under the alien enemy law was not a violation of the settlement agreement, which was completed in 2024.

The government also challenged Gallagher’s orders on the grounds that the “Indicative Reserve Decision,” issued by the US Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) a few weeks after Cristian’s deportation, decided that he would be rejected as a asylum because he was a member of the deanua deragua trend gang, which he refused.

The government also noted Cristian had a penalty for drug ownership at Harris County, Texas.

ABC News has reached the Department of Domestic Security and Lawyer Cristian to comment.

The majority of appeal panels, however, determine that the “indicative” asylum decision was achieved without the opportunity for Cristian to oppose his findings, “is not an authentic change in factual conditions.”

In an agreement, Gregory, a person who was appointed by Clinton, criticized Trump’s government for his efforts to request an alien enemy law to forgive the alleged violation of the settlement agreement in this case.

“The government’s argument in this case is that the obvious prayer is invalid from this law can be used to cancel every and all contract obligations from the federal government. That is not possible – and no – rule of law,” Gregory wrote.

In their differences of opinion, the Julius Richardson Circuit judge – a person appointed by Trump – argued that the District Court’s order exceeded his authority; And that Cristian who returned to the United States would be in vain, given the almost certainty that his request for asylum would be rejected.

“Still, in this case the District Court has directed the executive to be involved in a specific diplomatic negotiation with foreign forces. Although there are serious problems and a few reasons to think of his orders will help Cristian, the District Court includes a stronger order than other courts in various cases of alien enemies delayed throughout the country.” Richardson wrote.

Trump’s government can now ask the 4th Circuit Appeals Court to review cases or petitions to be reviewed by the US Supreme Court.