6 times the government of Trump disagreed with the opponent for the court orders

In almost three months since the inauguration of President Donald Trump, a lawyer who challenged his actions in the court accused that his government had violated the court orders in half a dozen opportunities, according to a court record reviewed by ABC News.

From freezing federal funds unilaterally to the use of alien enemy laws to deport non -citizens of the state, clashes have raised concerns about the separation of power and potential constitutional crisis.

The plaintiff who sued Trump’s government had accused the government of violating or ignoring court orders on at least six different opportunities, but so far there were no judges holding members of the Trump government in insulting the court. At least on four occasions, the judge has expressed concern about Trump’s administrative compliance with court orders.

The lawyer with the Department of Justice has passionately defending Trump’s administrative actions and argues that federal officials have strictly fulfilling legal court orders, while also questioning the legality of several orders. Each case is ongoing or appeal, so that the order of the District Court can be emptied along with the higher court weight.

Trump has repeatedly vowed to respect the court orders even if a judge decided on the parts of his agenda, even though he had tried to doubt the authority of several judges.

“Well, I always comply with the court and then I have to appeal,” Trump told ABC Rachel Scott in February, referring to cases involving the Department of Government Efficiency Elon Musk. In these cases, Trump suggested the judge’s command “slowing the momentum, and it gave people who were bent more time to cover the books. You know, if someone is bent and they are caught, others see it and suddenly it becomes more difficult in the future.”

Trump’s government now faces the most famous legal battle, because it is trying to protect Kilmar Abrego Garcia in Salvador’s detention even though the Supreme Court ordered his government to facilitate his liberation.

Using the alien enemy law to remove the alleged members of the de Aragua trend

Last month, Trump’s government moved more than 100 allegations of Venezuelan Gang members trends de Aragua to Salvador prison under the alien enemy law even though federal judges ordered them to be returned to the US

The US District Judge James Boasberg issued a direction that the two aircraft carrying the people to El Salvador were returned to the United States on March 15. Although the two aircraft still airs at the time of the order, the plane landed in Honduras before flying to El Salvador.

The lawyer who represented the Venezuelan people argued that the Trump government violated the court orders, and judge James Boasberg said that the government “acted in bad faith” when it was rushed to deportation flights.

The Supreme Court emptied his orders that prevented the transfer of the future under the alien enemy law because the plaintiff did not have a jurisdiction to submit a case at the DC before the Supreme Court’s decision, Judge Boasberg was considering the initial insulting process.

Trump maintains the use of alien enemies – telling reporters last month that he has the authority to remove non -citizens based on law – and has repeatedly criticized Judge Boasberg for blocking the transfer.

“[Secretary of State Marco Rubio has] Authority to expel bad people from our country. And you can’t stop him with a judge who sits behind a bench who doesn’t know what happened, who happens to be a radical crazy person, “Trump told Karen Travers from ABC.

Elimination of Kilmar Abrego Garcia

After Trump’s administration, Trump admitted that he had deported Salvador’s natives who lived in Maryland under protected legal status because of “administrative errors,” a federal judge ordered the government to facilitate its return to the United States.

After Trump’s government appealed the decision, the Supreme Court of the US concluded that judge Paula Xinis “correctly” required that the US facilitated the release of Abrego Garcia from Salvador detention; However, the High Court ordered Judge Xini to determine what Trump’s “respect” was related to the behavior of foreign affairs.

Since the supreme court’s ruling, the trump administration has double down on its allegation that abrego garcia is a member of ms-13-without providing any evidence-and claimed it lacks the authority to return him to the us during a meeting with trump with trumps in the oval office on monday, salvadoran President of Nayib Bukele Told Reporters that he lacks the power to return abrego garcia to the us

“The question doesn’t make sense. How can I smuggle terrorists to the United States?” Said Bukele.

Benjamin Osorio, a lawyer for Abrego Garcia, told ABC News that he was convinced that the Trump government opposed the court orders and that insulting orders might be the only thing that encouraged the US government to return his client from El Salvador.

Before his meeting with Sukele, Trump told reporters that he would respect the orders of the Supreme Court to return Abrego Garcia.

“If the Supreme Court says bring someone back, I will do that. I respect the Supreme Court,” Trump said.

Migrant Elimination to Third Countries

During the trial last week, a federal judge gave a lawyer with the Department of Justice two weeks to provide more information about the three new non -citizen transfer to El Salvador which lasted two days after he issued a temporary order that prevented similar deportation to countries other than their place of origin without a trial to cause concerns about their safety.

Judge Brian Murphy described “Potential Violations of Temporary Detention Orders” as “about” and set the April 28 session to learn more about deportation.

“This is something that concerns me,” Judge Murphy said. “I think that’s something we need to overcome.”

Lawyers with the Department of Justice agreed to provide more information about the transfer and defending government behavior.

Judge Murphy is considering expanding his court order to prevent Trump administration from removing non -citizens of the state to countries other than their place of origin without allowing non -state citizens to increase concerns about their safety.

Two days after Judge Murphy temporarily blocking deportation, Trump’s government announced that they had removed 17 members of the De Aragua and MS-13 trends to the famous Cecot prison El Salvador. According to the Plaintiff, some men on the flight have the final order to transfer to Venezuela and have never been given the right to challenge their transfer to El Salvador.

Unilateral freezing funds to the state

In February, US John McConnell District judge said that a group of State Attorney Generals submitted evidence that Trump’s administration “continued to freeze federal funds incorrectly and refused to continue the appropriate disbursement of federal funds” to the state even though there was an order “clear and not ambiguous” which prohibited them from blocking funds.

He ordered the government to “immediately return frozen funds” even though the State Attorney General then gave evidence that Trump’s administration continued to stop funds from FEMA. Many funding streams were restored in a few months after the orders of the McConnell judge.

Lawyers who represent the Trump government argue that funding restrictions are a legitimate way to identify and limit suspicion of fraud.

Block Fema’s grant

Two months after the McConnell judge ordered Trump’s government to withdraw funds to countries, he decided that the government was “silent” to stop millions of dollars in FEMA funding in direct violations from court orders.

Judge McConnell ordered Trump’s government to “stop” his efforts to hamper the disbursement of federal funds, finding the government directly violating his orders.

Last month, coalition 22 Attorney General asked Judge McConnell to stop the freezing after they gave evidence that Fema continued to limit more than 215 federal grants despite the court orders in blocking the freezing of Trump’s unilateral funds.

The lawyer with DOJ pushed back the request, with the reason that Fema “only applied the manual review process” of each grant.

Judge McConnell disagrees, found that the state presents “evidence that does not need to be questioned” that Fema “is basically [imposed] Categorist pauses that are not limited to payments “in direct violations of his preliminary order. He said the manual review process quoted by the Trump administration” violated “the preliminary order issued in this case.

Freezing billions of foreign assistance

A federal judge in February decided that Trump’s government was incorrectly arrested nearly $ 2 billion in foreign assistance despite an order to return the funds.

US District Judge Amir H. Ali blocked Trump’s administration from imposing blanket freezing on funding from the US International Development Agency, but the freezing continued for weeks, according to lawyers who represent foreign aid non -profit organizations. Lawyers who represent the Trump government argue that freezing of funds is needed to identify and block the potential of fraud.

In an order, Judge Ali wrote that Trump’s government confirmed the freezing by advancing “uncontrolled views of executive power which was consistently rejected by the Supreme Court – a view that violated many laws.”

After Trump’s government appealed on the order, the divided US Supreme Court refused a request to block orders, even though the judge ordered a lower court to clarify his original order.